The Forecourt EV Gap: Why Having Chargers Isn’t the Same as Having an EV Strategy
Ad
As EV networks grow, operational readiness, system integration and uptime management are becoming the key factors for building a scalable charging business. Titan Cloud and Metergram will be at the Intercharge Network Conference 2026 (ICNC), taking place September 1–3 in Germany, to connect on-site with the industry and explore these topics further.
Written by Brad Sandys, Head of EMEA Partnerships at Titan Cloud
As EV infrastructure investment accelerates across Europe, many forecourt and public charging operators are reaching a critical realisation: installing chargers is not the same as building a scalable EV business.
The first phase of the EV transition focused on deployment. Operators raced to get chargers into the ground, secure locations, and expand coverage. But as networks scale from dozens of chargers to hundreds — and eventually thousands — the operational complexity behind those assets begins to surface.
What worked at small scale no longer works when uptime expectations rise, utilisation increases, and customer tolerance disappears. The challenge is no longer infrastructure alone — it is operational readiness.
Recently, we sat down with David Cornish, Head of Solutions Architecture at Titan Cloud, and Björn Albertsson, Co-founder of Metergram, to discuss the key challenges facing operators as EV networks scale. As the industry increasingly focuses on operational readiness, system integration and uptime management, Titan Cloud and Metergram will continue the conversation at the Intercharge Network Conference 2026 (ICNC), taking place September 1-3 in Germany.
These were the main takeaways:
The Infrastructure Milestone Is Not the Strategy
Installing chargers is only the starting point. Operators need a plan for how those chargers will be monitored, maintained, repaired, reported on, and optimised. Once chargers are live, operators must answer a much harder set of questions:
- How are assets monitored in real time?
- How are faults identified, prioritised, and resolved?
- Who owns maintenance workflows?
- How is performance measured?
- How do operational teams coordinate across systems and vendors?
- How do operators maintain uptime as networks grow?
Without clear answers, operational gaps begin to emerge quickly.
As David Cornish explains, early deployments are often manageable because assets are new, utilisation is low, and teams can compensate manually when issues arise. But as networks expand, the pressure on operations increases rapidly, and manual processes can no longer scale effectively.
The EV Operating Model Is Different From Traditional Fuel
Traditional fuel infrastructure is mature, standardised, and deeply operationalised. Forecourt operators have spent decades refining maintenance workflows, service models, compliance processes, and uptime management across fuel assets.
EV charging introduces a fundamentally different operational environment: new software dependencies, new service expectations, new uptime pressures, and more complex vendor ecosystems.
Operators are suddenly managing charger management platforms (CPMS/CSMS), remote diagnostics, software updates, payment integrations, roaming relationships, contractor coordination and complex vendor ecosystem. The result is a much larger dependency on connected systems working together reliably.
And when those systems fail to integrate properly, the operational consequences are immediate.
Where Forecourt Operators Get Stuck
As EV networks scale, several operational bottlenecks consistently emerge.
1. Chargers Are Installed but Not Operationally Integrated
Many operators deploy chargers alongside existing forecourt systems rather than integrating them into a unified operational model. That creates disconnected workflows where EV assets are managed separately from fuel, retail, maintenance, and field operations.
Over time, this fragmentation creates inefficiency, duplicated effort, and limited visibility across the network.
As Björn Albertsson explains, many operators discover too late that their charging infrastructure was never designed to integrate cleanly with the rest of their operational environment. “On the surface, everything looks fine. Operators have chargers in the ground and a CPMS running. But those systems were rarely designed to work together with the wider operational infrastructure. At small scale, that gap is manageable. As the network grows, it becomes a serious operational problem.”
2. Maintenance Becomes Reactive
At smaller scale, maintenance often relies on spreadsheets, emails, phone calls, and manual escalation paths. But reactive processes break down rapidly when operators manage hundreds of connectors across multiple sites.
Without automation, fault resolution slows, service costs increase, and operational teams become trapped in constant firefighting. The result is longer resolution times, higher operational costs, and reduced charger availability.
3. Fault Visibility Is Inconsistent
One of the biggest misconceptions in EV operations is the difference between uptime and actual availability. A charger may technically report as “online” while still being unusable to drivers due to issues like:
- Damaged connectors
- Faulty payment terminals
- Broken displays
- Communication errors
Operators often believe they are meeting uptime targets while customers experience failed charging sessions. “What matters is availability – and that’s where a lot of operators lose visibility as they scale”, added David Cornish.
4. CSMS Data Does Not Translate Into Field Execution
Most charging management systems are effective at monitoring assets. But monitoring alone does not resolve operational issues.
A CSMS may identify a fault, but operators still need workflows that determine:
- What action should happen next
- Whether a remote fix is possible
- Which engineer or contractor should be dispatched
- How resolution is tracked and verified
Without connected workflows, data becomes disconnected from execution.
5. Teams Lack Clear Workflows and Accountability
As vendor ecosystems expand, operational accountability often becomes unclear.
Different systems manage payments, charger telemetry, maintenance records, and service dispatch — frequently without clean integration between them. When problems occur, systems and suppliers can end up pointing at each other rather than resolving issues quickly.
“What we also see is operators who don’t fully control their own charger data. It sits in a platform they don’t own, in a format they can’t easily extract or use. That becomes a real problem when they want to change platforms, add roaming partners, or just understand what’s happening across their network,” Björn Albertsson explains.
6. Customer Experience Suffers When Uptime Is Poor
Ultimately, drivers do not care about backend architecture or operational complexity. They care whether a charger works when they arrive.
Poor availability damages trust quickly, and in an increasingly competitive charging market, unreliable experiences directly impact revenue and loyalty.
Why Integration Matters
The operators scaling most successfully are treating EV operations as an integrated operational challenge, not simply a hardware rollout.
That means connecting charging software, maintenance workflows, asset records, service providers, remote diagnostics, reporting systems and operational teams into a unified operating model.
When systems are properly connected, operators can automate critical processes such as fault detection, issue triage, remote remediation, work order creation, contractor dispatch and performance reporting.
This shifts operations from reactive to proactive. It also enables scalability without relying on proportional increases in headcount.
As Björn Albertsson notes, many of the operational issues operators face today stem from early integration decisions that were treated as technical afterthoughts rather than strategic architecture choices. The longer those gaps remain unresolved, the more difficult and expensive they become to fix.
The Role of Titan EV + Metergram
This is where Titan Cloud and Metergram are helping operators rethink EV operations.
Titan EV focuses on operational execution — helping operators automate maintenance workflows, improve fault management, and increase charger reliability across large-scale networks.
Metergram brings expertise in system architecture, integration strategy, and operational readiness — helping operators design connected ecosystems that support long-term scalability rather than short-term deployment.
Together, the focus is not simply on adding more chargers. It is about helping operators build an EV operating model capable of supporting reliability, uptime, and sustainable growth.
Talk to Titan Cloud and Metergram at icnc26 | September 1-3, 2026 – Germany
If your organisation is scaling EV infrastructure and starting to feel the strain of disconnected systems, reactive maintenance, or inconsistent uptime, now is the time to rethink the operating model behind the network. Talk to Titan Cloud and Metergram about building an EV operating model designed for reliability, uptime, and scale. Connect on-site with the team at Intercharge Network Conference 2026.
